Pedagogy and Professional Responsibilities (PPR) TExES Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the Pedagogy and Professional Responsibilities (PPR) TExES Exam. Study with flashcards and multiple choice questions, each question has hints and explanations. Excel in your exam!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


What is the best way to monitor and assess students' process skills when solving math problems?

  1. Have students exchange papers and check the work

  2. Grade each paper on the process as well as the product

  3. Allow students to work the problems again carefully

  4. Design a checklist that students will use for self-assessment

The correct answer is: Grade each paper on the process as well as the product

Monitoring and assessing students' process skills when solving math problems is crucial for understanding their reasoning and problem-solving approaches. Grading each paper on both the process and the product allows educators to evaluate not only the final answer but also how students reached that answer. This approach provides insight into the students' thought processes, strategies employed, and any misconceptions they may have encountered along the way. When teachers focus solely on the final product, they miss vital information about how students are working through the problem, which is essential for guiding further instruction and interventions. Evaluating the process also encourages students to reflect on their methods and to understand that their approach to solving problems is just as important as arriving at the correct solution. This comprehensive assessment fosters a growth mindset, emphasizing continuous improvement and mastery of skills. In comparison, exchanging papers may promote peer learning, but it does not provide structured feedback on process skills. Allowing students to redo problems, while beneficial for practice, does not systematically assess their initial thought processes or strategies. Designing a checklist for self-assessment can be effective, but it primarily relies on students' ability to evaluate their own work accurately, which may vary significantly among learners and may not capture the full scope of their process skills.